- تخم مرغ را نجوشانید!
- توبهنامه زرینکوب از تملق ایرانیان
- ۴ راه غیرمرسوم برای افزایش طول عمر خودرو
- چرا زنان ژاپنی بدن لاغر و خوشفرمی دارند و همیشه جوان به نظر میرسند؟
- آیا شستن لباسها باعث از بین رفتن میکروبها و ویروسهای روی آنها میشود؟
- تهیه عطر با استفاده از روغن زیتون
- چرا وقتی نیمهشب از خواب بیدار میشوید، نمیتوانید حرکت کنید؟
- دلیل علمی کابوس قبل از بیداری
- چیزهایی که آقایان از خانمهایشان پنهان میکنند
- یازده نشانه رژیم غذایی نادرست
- فواید شگفتانگیز دوش آب گرم و آب سرد
- ۹ علامت مرگ زودرس در شما
- چیزهایی که خانمها از شوهرانشان پنهان میکنند
- ناشتا آب ولرم بخورید
- آداب خوابیدن در اسلام
- مامانهای خانهدار چطور پولساز شوند؟
- ۱۰ کاربرد شگفتانگیز پوست میوه و سبزیها
Ducklings and notions of same and different
Newborn ducklings can acquire notions of 'same' and 'different'
Scientists have shown that newly hatched ducklings can readily acquire the concepts of 'same' and 'different' -- an ability previously known only in highly intelligent animals such as apes, crows and parrots.
Scientists from the University of Oxford have shown that newly hatched ducklings can readily acquire the concepts of 'same' and 'different' -- an ability previously known only in highly intelligent animals such as apes, crows and parrots.
Ducklings and other young animals normally learn to identify and follow their mother through a type of learning called imprinting, which can occur in as little as 15 minutes after hatching. Imprinting is a powerful form of learning that can allow ducklings to follow any moving object, provided they see it within the species' typical 'sensitive period' for imprinting.
In this new study, published in the journal Science, ducklings were initially presented with a pair of objects either the same as or different from each other -- in shape or in colour -- which moved in a circular path.
The ducklings therefore 'imprinted' on these pairs of moving objects before being tested for their preferences between different sets of objects. In these subsequent choice tests, each duckling was allowed to follow either of two pairs of objects composed of shapes or colours to which the duckling had not previously been exposed.
For example, if an individual duckling had originally been exposed to a pair of spherical objects, in the choice test it may have had to choose between following a pair of pyramids (same) or a pair made up of one cube and one cuboid (different).
If the birds had learned the relationship between members of the original moving pair, then they should have followed the pairs of novel objects showing that same relationship (either 'same' or 'different'), even if they had never seen the test objects.
In the example above, ducklings that had been imprinted on two spheres should have followed the set of two pyramids, because they were the same as each other. This is exactly what the ducklings did.
About three-quarters of the ducklings preferred to follow the stimulus pair exhibiting the relationship they had learned in imprinting, and their accuracy was as good whether they had to learn the concept of equal or different, or whether they were tested with shapes or colours.
Professor Alex Kacelnik of Oxford University's Department of Zoology, who has worked extensively on learning and decision-making in animals, said: 'To our knowledge this is the first demonstration of a non-human organism learning to discriminate between abstract relational concepts without any reinforcement training. The other animals that have demonstrated this ability have all done so by being repeatedly rewarded for correct performance, while our ducklings did it spontaneously, thanks to their predisposition to imprint when very young.
'And because imprinting happens so quickly, the ducklings learned to discriminate relational concepts much faster than other species, and with a similar level of precision.'
Antone Martinho, a doctoral student in Oxford's Department of Zoology and the study's first author, said: 'While it seems surprising at first that these one-day-old ducklings can learn something that normally only very intelligent species can do, it also makes biological sense. When a duckling is young, it needs to be able to stay near its mother for protection, and an error in identifying her could be fatal.
'Ducks walk, swim and fly, and are constantly changing their exact shape and appearance as they extend their wings or become partially submerged, or even change angle with respect to the viewer. If the ducklings just had a visual "snapshot" of their mother, they would lose her. They need to be able to flexibly and reliably identify her, and a library of concepts and characteristics describing her is a much more efficient way to do so, compared with a visual memory of every possible configuration of the mother and her environment.
'Still, this is an unexpected feat for a duckling, and a further reminder that "bird-brain" is quite an unfair slur.'
The discovery of relational concept learning in a new species and in a newly hatched baby bird suggests that this ability may not be as rare or as difficult as previously thought.
Professor Kacelnik added: 'It may mean that relational concepts are adaptively useful or even necessary to a wider variety of animal. Most animals will, like the ducklings, need identification mechanisms that are robust to natural variation. A challenge we face now is to identify the processes by which the animals' brains achieve it.'
Story Source: sciencedaily
بخش نظرات این مطلب
به دلیل به روز بودن سایت از صفحات دیگر نیز، دیدن فرمایید.